Here is a recording of the second session of feedback for our Short Film. This time the audience was more varied, with students from subjects such as English, Psychology and Sociology.
In this session, the feedback was overly positive; probably more positive than the first session.
An in-depth explanation of what we learned from all of our feedback can be found here in my Evaluation Prezi.
Showing posts with label Feedback. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Feedback. Show all posts
Friday, 25 March 2011
Thursday, 24 March 2011
Audience Feedback on Ancillary Tasks
Here are a few recordings of interviews that were held to get some qualitative feedback on our Poster and Magazine Review Page. As with one of the Short Film feedback sessions, we interviewed media students and a media teacher, so that we would get a more detailed analysis of our work.
Tom has only been able to upload three of the six recordings due to technical error.
Unlike our Short Film, which wasn't received brilliantly, both of our ancillary products were very well received. In summary, people thought highly of the verisimilitude of the review and the authenticity of the poster, and agreed that both would fulfill their purposes well.
An in-depth explanation of what we learned from all of our feedback can be found here in my Evaluation Prezi.
Tom has only been able to upload three of the six recordings due to technical error.
Unlike our Short Film, which wasn't received brilliantly, both of our ancillary products were very well received. In summary, people thought highly of the verisimilitude of the review and the authenticity of the poster, and agreed that both would fulfill their purposes well.
An in-depth explanation of what we learned from all of our feedback can be found here in my Evaluation Prezi.
Audience Feedback on Main Task: Session 1
Here is a video recording of the first of two planned qualitative feedback sessions for our short film. The audience was comrpised of media students and a media teacher, so Tom and I tried to ask questions that would take advantage of their heightened ability to pull texts apart and analyse them in-depth.
The audience response wasn't, perhaps, as positive as we would have liked, but it still brought up some significant points. In summary, although the film is visually accomplished, and the sound is well edited, some of the audience found the surreal narrative too confusing, and this detracted from their enjoyment of the film.
An in-depth explanation of what we learned from all of our feedback can be found here in my Evaluation Prezi.
The audience response wasn't, perhaps, as positive as we would have liked, but it still brought up some significant points. In summary, although the film is visually accomplished, and the sound is well edited, some of the audience found the surreal narrative too confusing, and this detracted from their enjoyment of the film.
An in-depth explanation of what we learned from all of our feedback can be found here in my Evaluation Prezi.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)